Every one of us has attempted to talk with someone about something important to us or to them and gotten nowhere. We have broached a subject or tried to take part in a conversation and have our point-of-view be heard but to no avail. We have been unpersuasive in making our point and, too often, we found the conversation ended with us becoming more frustrated than before the attempt. Not only was the issue unresolved, but sometimes the other party had become defensive or more entrenched in their own point-of-view than they were before the discussion.
Here are
some ideas that might help you to turn things around:
Before
engagement in discussion resolve personally that we are out to
solve a problem or look at an issue with wisdom and fairness and not out to
unilaterally ‘win’ an argument. You have a point of view and want a fair
hearing, and so does the other person. When
we engage in discussion, we must understand that often better solutions are a
result of not insisting that our way is the only way. We must be trying to
understand each other and the facts that define the issue. The middle way or the not-entertained third
way does not necessarily mean a compromise; it can be a higher way that may
have not been seen by either party when emotionality was clouding our/their
vision.
Respect and
listening must come first. If that is understood, both parties feel safe to contribute
and express their viewpoint without attack by the other. Then, hopefully, each
person will honestly believe that their input counted and that a synergistic
outcome is possible where everybody gains: Stephen Covey famously called it “win-win.”
Look at the
information, the data, the evidence, the facts contributed to by all parties of
the discussion to the issue at hand. When engagement begins, that is where you
start. Do not try to defend or impose the too-often emotionally driven assumptions,
opinions, or independently-arrived-at ‘conclusions’ that unproductive dialogue
often starts with. Productive dialogue
is not a modern political ‘debate’--may God forbid.
There are
methods of engagement that foster helpful dialogue and conversely behaviors
that kill it.
Let’s look at behaviors that close down healthy dialogue.
Demeaning comments; sarcastic remarks; name-calling; threats; accusations; blame; coercing; force; revenge; violence.
Avoiding, withdrawal, silent fuming, coldness, passive resistance.
Playing verbal games to overpower or confuse the other person.
Creating stories in our mind (subjective conclusions) that paint the other party in a negative way and then shape our unhelpful self-justifying responses to or judgments about anything they say to us.
That
which produces healthy dialogue is to:
·
Look
at your own motives first. Am I being
honest? Am I being just? Am I being fair, and trying to see it through
their eyes? Am I at all at fault?
· Identify
mutual purpose and shared goals, and then state them and share them and explore
them with the other person.
·
Maintain
mutual respect; if they push back, do something to make the other person more
comfortable; try to calm them with a soft answer but be sincere. This does not
mean you have to back down; it may mean that you have to try another approach. You
can smile and say something like, “I think I see your point (and then restate
it in your own words), but allow me to see if I can my point more clear to you.
. . .”
· Get
all relevant, truthful information out into the open and into a common pool. The larger the pool, the smarter the decisions the parties will make and the
greater the buy-in.
· Stay focused no matter what happens. Stay focused on what you really want—for yourself, and for your relationship, and for others who could be impacted. Make these things your highest priorities. Don’t get derailed or divert from your objectives by what the other party may throw up at the beginning of the conversation.
·
Clarify what you don’t want to happen—bad feelings, wasted time or money, damaged
opportunities, etc. See where this is
taking you.
How to
speak persuasively and productively:
·
Pray
first if you believe in this way of receiving strength or insight.
·
Share
your facts; your facts are not an attack.
Facts are things, observations, not assertions, not conclusions. Try to keep
personalities out of it to start with.
·
Tell your story—your point of view, your
reasoning path which have led to your tentative conclusions. Make sure
you are thinking about and talking about the real issue. Use “I” statements,
not “you” statements.
·
Encourage
them to tell their story—their point of view. Then listen carefully. Be curious
and be courteous. This brings their information into the pool.
·
Use
tentative language—“In my opinion,” “It’s starting to look like. . .”
·
Be
patient. Don’t assume you know the
others’ motives. Get to the source of their feelings. Try to get to an area of agreement. Don’t force a conclusion by using your
authority, or age, or position. Use persuasion.
· Build upon what you’ve mutually come up with. Do something; come to a plan of action that involves both of you. Write it down. Make a commitment. You are both accountable for the outcome, but only you are accountable for your commitment to the person and the process. Keep thinking, and say, “We can work this out.” Be positive and confident and know that you can; then encourage them to believe that ‘we’ can.
These ideas have worked for many good communicators. It is my hope they may help you the next time you need to have productive dialogue where in the past you have had only frustration or hard feelings.
·
No comments:
Post a Comment