Thursday, February 14, 2019

THE CHOICE OF ABORTION

Ask yourself—whether you are a pregnant woman or the man who got her pregnant or someone who could influence an elected ‘lawmaker’—this question: What is a more important ‘human right’ than the right to live? If you sincerely believe life is a right, understand that there is a corresponding ‘wrong’ to take life. Since you are privileged to yet be alive you can consider the question—right or wrong as pertaining to the choice to abort.
Who is more deserving—has a right to live—a baby (whether birthed or yet-to-be-born who has done nothing to harm or take from society) or one who consents to kill, or pays to have killed (or takes ‘welfare services’ to kill) so their own life is not ‘inconvenienced’? We are not talking here about ‘a woman’s own body,’ we are talking about another body, another human body, a smaller utterly defenseless human body, temporarily housed in the body of someone who almost always has made some irresponsible, not-thought-out-ahead-of-time, decisions, but who could yet make the most important decision of her life. Most women who choose to abort remain quite alive; the destroyed baby, by definition does not--the baby had no choice.   
Because a baby does not yet have ‘social utility’ does he or she (this child of God is not an ‘it’) not have an inalienable right to have a life and a voice through an advocate and the protection of a humane society?
Is there one consenter to or demander of abortion in this world willing to give up her own life in favor of allowing a new, intrinsically more worthy human being to have a chance for a life? NO!  Is there one shrill demonstrating demander who is not glad that she, herself, is alive and was not aborted?  NO! She clearly believes her life is more important. But would she consider this thought before she (either the pregnant woman or her abortion supporter) becomes a living accessory-to-the-fact of a murder?
If this pregnant desiring-t0-be aborted woman needs ‘counseling’ (and she does) before this irreversible act is done here is some free counsel from the other side and may it be heard:  Give birth, give life; give another woman who cannot have a baby, who earnestly desires to have a baby, a chance for adoption of the pregnant woman’s unwanted ‘burden,’ ‘mistake,’ or ‘inconvenience’ to love, nurture, and rear. The adoptive mother will even pay for what so many others dismissively call an ‘it.’ 
Talk about a win-win! The baby will live; a woman who can't have a child will get the privilege to rear one; the woman who thought of having the abortion will be free of a life-time of guilt and regret; and society will take a step back from the brink of destruction by not abetting, encouraging, or countenancing this crime against humanity. 
Please reconsider the gravity and scope of this most important choice!



No comments: