After nearly five years’ writing of my Omnium-Gatherum-Millerum musings I am ready (soon) to give it a
facelift and a new title. I am still,
and always will be, highly indebted to the ‘giants’ whom I have never met—except
through their writings—who have inspired me and persuaded me to continue in the
hopes that my own postings (and theirs) may be helpful to someone else.
As I acknowledged in one of my very first forays into public
writing I make no claim on ‘pure originality’ in most of my postings, but I do make
them as an educated man. (Indeed, I believe that few writers from any age were ‘purely original.) I give credit to the commonly attributed
source when I know it, but often use my lifetime of notes and thoughts
generated by my past and current reading, personal experiences, and, yes, ‘inspiration’
to provide my material. What the reader can count on is that I believe in that
which I write and which I selectively share in the writings of others, and I
believe these things can have a positive influence on those who read with an
open mind and open heart.
I also remind the reader of this essay that I originally started my
weblog at the urging of my wife and for the benefit of my children and stepchildren and
close friends. Unfortunately, I believe
that few of these loved-ones read these things anymore (or ever did) with any
regularity. I console myself that one
infinitely greater than I faced the same difficulty: “And when [Jesus] was come
into his own country, he taught them….[And] they were astonished, and said,
Whence hath this man this wisdom, and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenter’s son. . . ? And
they were offended in him. But Jesus
said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and
in his own house. And he did not many
mighty works there because of their unbelief” (Matthew 13:54-58). I am not a prophet, but I am a man who loves his family.
Lastly, as anyone who has read me knows, my postings are of a
decidedly ‘moralistic’ flavor. This is
intentional. It is intentional even at
the expense of ‘offending’ potential readership. Being a moralist in the 21st
Century is very out-of-style and out-of-step with the Millennial and even the
late Baby-boomer generations. But being
a moralist, “the voice of one crying in the wilderness” (see Matthew 3:1-3)
seems more and more in my old age to be my calling. There are few who do it because of its ‘political
incorrectness’ and because many good people have been cowed into submission because
of the twisting of the terms ‘tolerance’ and ‘judgmental’ and even ‘bigoted’ or
‘mean-spirited.’ People who use these and similar terms are not on the high
ground. More often than not they are
just strident self-justifiers of their own immorality.
No comments:
Post a Comment